Australian crime story. Good read so far - might not finish it by tomorrow night but.
Outstanding NZ writer. I found this book a compelling read. It's a different take on the crime novel. Dual narration and a new POV. A re-examination of our cultural acceptance of violence against women. Recommended.
Not going to finish this. It's a bit too cosy and I found it slightly smug. Not for me.
Too much attention to physical attractiveness and clothing/style. Crime story was satisfying - even if some of the characters relied on inspired guessing rather too much.
Started this ages ago and finally finished it. I list interest around 250 pages in (I lnow! I had really persisted and thought it would stay unfinished - but here we are). It was slow going and some strands of the narrative did not hold my interest. Good finish, but the first third especially did not have much draw.
Classic NZ fiction
One of the best opening sentences in NZ fiction.
Well crafted and engrossing- I really enjoyed this book and couldn't wait to read more. This has made me reconsider some of my other reviews.
Light and fun with lots of characterful detail. As recommended by VSW :)
Galloping through the last two books in this series before The Return To School... This one stretched credibility too far at times. And some details were not well thought-through. Plus I got really annoyed with the first-person narrator - waaaaaay too much of her personal take and experiences. I know that's the point of this style of narrative, but the character must be up to the task... I am on the latest novel in the series now, and I
Enjoying reading a NZ crime writer. But looking forward to picking up a few recommendations from VSW This book steps up ftom the previous two. But not enough: come on Vanda, give it some action!
2.5 stars really. Slow and not very exciting. The author can write excellent action, but she too often opts for her central character's inner monologue. I'd like more thrills and fewer breaks for milo and toffee pops. Frustrating.
This review is a bit of a spoiler. A very exciting and well -written action sequence in the middle of the book had me gripped - BUT the title, setting, and even this excellent scene are red herrings... sigh 2.5 stars
Best book I've read this summer. Really well written - unlike a few I've persisted with lately. A great story, with likeable/realistic characters. Darker details relieved by classic small-town Aotearoa setting and typically Kiwi humour.
Take care: Contains suicide ideation.
Very dark humour. Took me a while to adjust to the tone - the book got better as it progressed. Highly original.
Abandonded
The second in the series, this book doesn't break much new ground.
Laconic Aussie storytelling, and lean evocative prose that suits the Queensland setting for this grim crime novel. I liked it!
A welcome return to Scandinavian crime :) - complex plotting and a huge cast of characters - I really had to concentrate - but a very rewarding read and a massive relief after enduring a couple of awful books before this :)
Terrible. This book made me laugh out loud so many times. I read it because of the movie/hype - I like thrillers - but the writing is AWFUL: unimaginative description and dull, unnecessary detail, but other moments land without context or reason. The reader gets a distorted sense of what is important or foreshadowing, results in lots of irritating red herrings or dead ends. Characters are clichéd and poorly developed. The plot is wildly implausible. It lacks craft and it feels unedited. Example: "Are you OK?" "I'm OK. Are you OK?" "Yes, I think I'm OK." Variations of this appear at least ten times over the course of the book. Another couple of moments: "There was a round, circular table." "The attic was draughty" and then a few pages later, "The attic was stuffy"... better writers have written better versions of this story. (Jane Eyre, Rebecca etc). A Harlan Coben wannabe.
Classic
I can't believe that I persevered with this book. It is awful. The first third was very slow going. A stultifying combination of cumbersome writing with far too much detail, and a pantheon of characters, which I struggled to manage - largely due to their lack of colour. There is also a heavy reliance on lengthy exposition via dialogue. Suddenly we arrive at a hideous and graphic account of sexual assault. And these two elements characterise this book: tedious, dry detail and voyeuristic descriptions of torture and sexual violence against women. The book purports to take a feminist stance, but it reads as overltly sadistic and prurient. The best character, Lisbet, is seen mostly from Blomkvist's POV, so we get a patriarchal assessment of her for most of the book, which focuses mostly on her physical appearance. And Blomkvist is a total cliché, arrogant, humourless, and lead by his penis. The title is a misnomer. It should be called "The Dull Man who Talked too much". I made myself finish it, but I hated this book.
I found this to be slow going. The plot is excellent, but again the writing is laboured and has too much explanation- well, too much for a thriller.
The strongest of the trilogy - and a really compelling read.
Like all of Jónasson's books that I have read, the plotting is atrong - the the telling is not fast-paced enough to build momentum.
Book 1 of a trilogy. Reversed timeline across the three books made for insightful reading.
Stand alone thriller. Plot driven and compelling.
Innovative plotting, but sometimes a little bit over written or too descriptive. Excellent storyline.